While The Georgetown Law Journal has formally launched its new website and online companion, Ipsa Loquitur, we are still in the “final proofing” stages. Though we have done our best to remove them, please excuse any small typographical, linking or spelling errors you might find and feel free to notify us about their presence at geoljonline@gmailcom.
Symposium: Police/State: Race, Power, and Control
The Georgetown Law Journal's 2015 Symposium, "Police/State: Race, Power, and Control," took place on November 20.
News & Events
Supreme Court Cites GLJ Article in Bank Markazi v. Peterson
In the recently decided Bank Markazi v. Peterson, the Supreme Court quoted Daniel J. Meltzer’s 1998 article in The Georgetown Law Journal. See Bank Markazi v. Peterson, No. 14–770, 13, 15 n.19 (U.S. Apr. 20, 2016) (quoting Daniel J. Meltzer, Congress, Courts, and Constitutional Remedies, 86 Geo. L.J. 2537, 2538, 2549 (1998)), https://perma.cc/VH7F-QTLN.
Supreme Court Cites GLJ Article in Luis v. United States
The Georgetown Law Journal was cited in the Supreme Court’s recently released Luis v. United States opinion. Read the full decision here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-419_nmip.pdf
Justice Department Writes Response to Kozinski’s “Criminal Law 2.0”
Andrew D. Goldsmith, Associate Deputy Attorney General, and John F. Walsh, United States Attorney for the District of Colorado, have written a letter on behalf of the Department of Justice responding to Judge Alex Kozinski’s preface to the 44th edition of the Annual Review of Criminal Procedure, “Criminal Law 2.0.”
Judge Kozinski’s Preface to 44th ARCP, “Criminal Law 2.0,” Quoted in NY Times Article
Judge Alex Kozinski’s recently published preface to the 44th edition of the Annual Review of Criminal Procedure, “Criminal Law 2.0,” was quoted earlier this week in a New York Times article on prisoners’ rights.
GLJ Vol. 102 Article Cited by Sotomayor in Glossip v. Gross Dissent
Congratulations to Georgetown Law Journal author Deborah Denno (Arthur A. McGivney Professor, Fordham Law), whose Volume 102 article, “Lethal Injection Chaos Post-Baze,” was cited in Justice Sotomayor’s dissent in Glossip v. Gross.